# Tag: graphics

Back to Working with Statistics Canada Data in R, Part 5.

## Introduction

In the previous part of the Working with Statistics Canada Data in R series, we have retrieved the following key labor force indicators from the 2016 Canadian census:

• labor force participation rate, employment rate, and unemployment rate,
• percent of workers by work situation: full time vs part time, by gender, and
• education levels of people aged 25 to 64, by gender,

… for Canada as a country and for the largest metropolitan areas in each of Canada’s five geographic regions.

Now we are going to plot the labor force participation rates and the percent of workers by work situation. And in the next post, I’ll show how to write functions to automate repetitive plotting tasks using the 2016 Census education data as an example.

As always, let’s start with loading the required packages. Note ggrepel package, which helps to prevent overlapping of data points and text labels in our graphics.

``````# load packages
library(tidyverse)
library(ggrepel)``````

## Ordered Bar Plot: Labor Force Involvement Rates

Why the bar plot for this data? Well, the bar plot is one of the simplest and thus easiest to interpret plots, and the data – labor force involvement rates – fits this type of plot nicely. We will plot the rates for all our regions in the same graphic, and we are going to order regions by unemployment rate.

#### Creating an Ordering Vector

In the previous part of this series, we retrieved 2016 Census data for labor force involvement rates, did some preparatory work required to plot the data with ggplot2 package, and saved the data as the ‘labor’ dataframe. There is one more step we need to complete before we can plot this data: we need to create an ordering vector with unemployment numbers and append this vector to ‘labor’.

``````# prepare 'labor' dataset for plotting:
# create an ordering vector to set the order of regions in the plot
labor <- labor %>%
group_by(region) %>%  # groups data by region
filter(indicator == "unemployment rate") %>%
select(-indicator) %>%
rename(unemployment = rate) %>%
left_join(labor, by = "region") %>%
mutate(indicator = factor(indicator,
levels = c("participation rate",
"employment rate",
"unemployment rate")))``````

Note the left_join call, which joins the result of manipulating the ‘labor’ dataframe back onto ‘labor’. If it seems confusing, take a look at this code, which returns the same output:

``````# alt. (same output):
labor_order <- labor %>%
filter(indicator == "unemployment rate") %>%
select(-indicator) %>%
rename(unemployment = rate)

labor <- labor %>%
left_join(labor_order, by = "region") %>%
mutate(indicator = factor(indicator,
levels = c("participation rate",
"employment rate",
"unemployment rate")))``````

Also note the mutate call that manually re-assigns factor levels of the ‘indicator’ variable, so that labor force indicators are plotted in the logical order: first labor force participation rate, then employment rate, and finally the unemployment rate. Remember that ggplot2 plots categorical variables in the order of factor levels.

#### Making an Ordered Bar Plot

``````# plot data
plot_labor <-
labor %>%
ggplot(aes(x = reorder(region, unemployment),
y = rate,
fill = indicator)) +
geom_col(width = .6, position = "dodge") +
geom_text(aes(label = rate),
position = position_dodge(width = .6),
show.legend = FALSE,
size = 3.5,
vjust = -.4) +
scale_y_continuous(name = "Percent",
breaks = seq(0, 80, by = 10)) +
scale_x_discrete(name = NULL) +
scale_fill_manual(name = "Indicator:",
values = c("participation rate" = "deepskyblue2",
"employment rate" = "olivedrab3",
"unemployment rate" = "tomato")) +
theme_bw() +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = .5, size = 14,
face = "bold"),
plot.subtitle = element_text(hjust = .5,
size = 13,
margin = margin(b = 15)),
panel.grid.major = element_line(colour = "grey88"),
panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.y = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold",
margin = margin(r = 8)),
legend.title = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
legend.text = element_text(size = 12),
legend.position = "bottom",
plot.caption = element_text(size = 11, hjust = 0,
margin = margin(t = 15))) +
labs(title = "Labor Force Indicators in Canada's Geographic Regions' Largest Cities in 2016",
subtitle = "Compared to Canada, Ordered by Unemployment Rate",
caption = "Data: Statistics Canada 2016 Census.")``````

Note the x = reorder(region, unemployment) inside the aes call: this is where we order the plot’s x axis by unemployment rates. Remember that we have grouped our data by region so that we could put regions on the X axis.

Note also the scale_fill_manual function, where we manually assign colors to the plot’s fill aesthetic (hence scale_fill_manual).

#### Saving the Plot

Now that we have made the plot, let’s create the directory where we will be saving our graphics, and save our plot to it:

``````# save plot to a specific folder
dir.create("output") # creates folder
ggsave("output/plot_labor.png",
plot_labor,
width = 11, height = 8.5, units = "in")``````

Finally, let’s print the plot to screen:

``````# print plot to screen
print(plot_labor)``````

## Faceted Plot: Full Time vs Part Time Workers, by Gender

This will be a more complex task compared to plotting labor force participation rates. Here we have the data that is broken down by work situation (full-time vs part-time), and by gender, and also by region. And ideally, we also want the total numbers for full-time and part-time workers to be presented in the same plot. This is too complex to be visualized as a simple bar plot like the one we’ve just made.

To visualize all these data in a single plot, we’ll use faceting: breaking down one plot into multiple sub-plots. And I suggest a donut chart – a variation on a pie chart that has a round hole in the center. Note that generally speaking, pie charts have a well-deserved bad reputation, which boils down to two facts: humans have difficulty visually comparing angles, and if you have many categories in your data, pie charts become an unreadable mess. Here and here you can read more about pie charts’ shortcomings, and which plots can best replace pie charts.

So why an I using a pie chart? Well, three reasons, really. First, we’ll only have four categories inside the chart, so it won’t be messy. Second, it is technically a donut chart, not a pie chart, and it is the empty space inside each donut where I will put the total numbers for full- and part-time workers. And third, I’d like to show how to make donut charts with ggplot2 in case you ever need this.

#### Preparing the Data for Plotting

In the previous post, we have retrieved the 2016 Census data on the percentage of full-time and part-time workers, by gender, and saved it in the ‘work’ dataframe. Let’s now prepare the data for plotting. For that, we’ll need to add three more variables. ‘type_gender’ will be a categorical variable that combines work type and gender – currently these are two different variables. ‘percent’ will contain percentages for each combination of work type and gender, by region. And ‘percent_type’ will contain total percentages for full-time and part-time workers, by region.

``````# prepare 'work' dataset for plotting:
work <- work %>%
group_by(region) %>%
mutate(type_gender = str_c(type, gender, sep = " ")) %>%
# percent of workers by region, work type, and gender
mutate(percent = round(count/sum(count)*100, 1)) %>%
# percent of workers by work type, total
group_by(region, type) %>%
mutate(percent_type = sum(percent))``````

#### Making a Faceted Donut Plot

Now the dataset is ready for plotting, so let’s make a faceted plot. Since ggplot2 doesn’t like pie-charts (of which a donut chart is a variant), there is no ‘pie’ geom, and we’ll have to get a bit hacky with the code. Pay close attention to the in-code comments.

``````# plot work data (as a faceted plot)
plot_work <-
work %>%
ggplot(aes(x = "",
y = percent,
fill = type_gender)) +
geom_col(color = "white") + # sectors' separator color
coord_polar(theta = "y") +
geom_text_repel(aes(label = percent),
# put text labels inside corresponding sectors:
position = position_stack(vjust = .5),
# repelling force:
force = .02,
size = 4.5) +
geom_label_repel(data = distinct(select(work, c("region",
"type",
"percent_type"))),
aes(x = 0, # turns pie chart into donut chart
y = percent_type,
label = percent_type,
fill = type),
size = 4.5,
fontface = "bold",
force = .02, # repelling force
show.legend = FALSE) +
scale_fill_manual(name = "Work situation",
labels = c("full time" = "all full-time",
"part time" = "all part-time"),
values = c("full time male" = "olivedrab4",
"full time female" = "olivedrab1",
"part time male" = "tan4",
"part time female" = "tan1",
"full time" = "green3",
"part time" = "orange3")) +
facet_wrap(~ region) +
guides(fill = guide_legend(nrow = 3)) +
theme_void() +
theme(plot.title = element_text(size = 14, face = "bold",
margin = margin(t = 10, b = 20),
hjust = .5),
strip.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
plot.caption = element_text(size = 11, hjust = 0,
margin = margin(t = 20, b = 10)),
legend.title = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
legend.text = element_text(size = 12),
# change size of symbols (colored squares) in legend:
legend.key.size = unit(1.1, "lines"),
legend.position = "bottom") +
labs(title = "Percentage of Workers, by Work Situation & Gender, 2016",
caption = "Note: Percentages may not add up to 100% due to values rounding.\nData source: Statistics Canada 2016 Census.")``````

Here is our plot:

There are a number of things in the plot’s code that I’d like to draw your attention to. First, a ggplot2 pie chart is a stacked bar chart (geom_col) made in the polar coordinate system: coord_polar(theta = “y”). For geom_col, position = “stack” is the default, so it is not specified in the code. Note also that geom_col needs the X aesthetic, but a pie chart doesn’t have an X coordinate. So I used x = “” to trick geom_col into thinking it has the X aesthetic, otherwise it would have thrown an error: “geom_col requires the following missing aesthetics: x”.

But how do you turn a pie chart into a donut chart? To do this, I set x = 0 inside the ggrepel::geom_label_repel aes call. Try passing different values to x to see how it works: for example, x = 1 turns the plot into a standard pie chart, while x = -1 turns a donut into a ring.

In order to prevent labels overlap, I used ggrepel::geom_text_repel and ggrepel::geom_label_repel to add text labels to our plot instead of ggplot2::geom_text and ggplot2::geom_label. And position = position_stack(vjust = .5) inside geom_text_repel puts text labels in the middle of their respective sectors of the donut plot.

The data = distinct(select(work, c(“region”, “type”, “percent_type”)) argument to geom_label_repel prevents the duplication of labels containing total numbers for full-time and part-time workers.

The scale_fill_manual is used to manually assign colors and names to our plot’s legend items, and guides(fill = guide_legend(nrow = 3)) changes the order of legend items.

Finally, facet_wrap(~ region) creates a faceted plot, by region.

And just as we did with the previous plot, let’s save our plot to the ‘output’ folder and print it to screen:

``````# save plot to 'output' folder
ggsave("output/plot_work.png",
plot_work,
width = 11, height = 8.5, units = "in")

# print work plot to screen
print(plot_work)``````

In the next post, I will show how to write functions to automate repetitive plotting tasks.

Back to Working with Statistics Canada Data in R, Part 2.
Forward to Working with Statistics Canada Data in R, Part 4.

## Exploring Data

In the previous part of this series, we have retrieved CANSIM data on the weekly wages of Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Canadians of 25 years and older, living in Saskatchewan, and the CPI data for the same province. We then used the CPI data to adjust the wages for inflation, and saved the results as wages_0370 dataset. To get started, let’s take a quick look at the dataset, what types of variables it contains, which should be considered categorical, and what unique values categorical variables have:

``````# explore wages_0370 before plotting
View(wages_0370)
map(wages_0370, class)
map(wages_0370, unique)``````

The first two variables – year and group – are of the type “character”, and the rest are numeric of the type “double” (“double” simply means they are not integers, i.e. can have decimals).

Also, we can see that wages_0370 dataset is already in the tidy format, which is an important prerequisite for plotting with ggplot2 package. Since ggplot2 is included into tidyverse, there is no need to install it separately.

## Preparing Data for Plotting

At this point, our data is almost ready to be plotted, but we need to make one final change. Looking at the unique values, we can see that the first two variables (year and group) should be numeric (integer) and categorical respectively, while the rest are continuous (as they should be).

In R, categorical variables are referred to as factors. It is important to expressly tell R which variables are categorical, because mapping ggplot aesthetics – things that go inside aes() – to a factor variable makes ggplot2 use a discrete colour scale (distinctly different colors) for different categories (different factor levels in R terms). Otherwise, values would be plotted to a gradient, i.e. different hues of the same color. There are several other reasons to make sure you expressly identify categorical variables as factors if you are planning to visualize your data. I understand that this might be a bit too technical, so if you are interested, you can find more here and here. For now, just remember to convert your categorical variables to factors if you are going to plot your data. Ideally, do it always – it is a good practice to follow.

( ! ) It is a good practice to always convert categorical variables to factors.

So, let’s do it: convert year to an integer, and group to a factor. Before doing so, let’s remove the word “population” from “Non-Aboriginal population” category, so that our plot’s legend takes less space inside the plot. We can also replace accented “é” with ordinary “e” to make typing in our IDE easier. Note that the order is important: first we edit the string values of a “character” class variable, and only then convert it to a factor. Otherwise, our factor will have missing levels.

( ! ) Converting a categorical variable to a factor should be the last step in cleaning your dataset.

``````wages_0370 <- wages_0370 %>%
mutate(group = str_replace_all(group,
c(" population" = "", "é" = "e"))) %>%
mutate_at("year", as.integer) %>%
mutate_if(is.character, as_factor)``````

Note: if you only need to remove string(s), use str_remove or str_remove_all:

``mutate(group = str_remove(group, " population"))``

## Plotting with ggplot2

Finally, we are ready to plot the data with ggplot2!

``````# plot data
plot_wages_0370 <-
wages_0370 %>%
ggplot(aes(x = year, y = dollars_2007,
color = group)) +
geom_point(size = 2.5) +
geom_line(size = 1.2) +
geom_label(aes(label = round(dollars_2007)),
# alt: use geom_label_repel() # requires ggrepel
fontface = "bold",
label.size = .5, # label border thickness
size = 3.5, # label size
# force = .005, # repelling force: requires ggrepel
show.legend = FALSE) +
coord_cartesian(ylim = c(650, 1000)) + # best practice to set scale limits
scale_x_continuous(breaks = 2007:2018) +
scale_y_continuous(name = "2007 dollars",
breaks = seq(650, 1000, by = 50)) +
scale_color_manual(values = c("First Nations" = "tan3",
"Non-Aboriginal" = "royalblue",
"Metis" = "forestgreen")) +
theme_bw() +
theme(plot.title = element_text(size = 12,
face = "bold",
hjust = .5,
margin = margin(b = 10)),
plot.caption = element_text(size = 11),
panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
panel.grid.major = element_line(colour = "grey85"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 11),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold",
margin = margin(r = 10)),
legend.title = element_blank(),
legend.position = "bottom",
legend.text = element_text(size = 11, face = "bold")) +
labs(title = "Average Weekly Wages, Adjusted for Inflation,\nby Aboriginal Group, 25 Years and Older",
caption = "Wages data: Statistics Canada Data Table 14-10-0370\nInflation data: Statistics Canada Data Vector v41694489")``````

This is what the resulting graphic looks like:

Let’s now look at what this code does. We start with feeding our data object wages_0370 into ggplot function using pipe.

( ! ) Note that ggplot2 internal syntax differs from tidyverse pipe-based syntax, and uses + instead of %>% to join code into blocks.

Next, inside ggplot(aes()) call we assign common aesthetics for all layers, and then proceed to choosing the geoms we need. If needed, we can assign additional/override common aesthetics inside individual geoms, like we did when we told geom_label to use dollars_2007 variable values (rounded to a dollar) as labels. If you’d like to find out more about what layers are, and about ggplot2 grammar of graphics, I recommend this article by Hadley Wickham.

#### Choosing Plot Type

Plot type in each layer is determined by geom_* functions. This is where geoms are:

``````geom_point(size = 2.5) +
geom_line(size = 1.2) +
geom_label(aes(label = round(dollars_2007)),
# alt: use geom_label_repel() # requires ggrepel
fontface = "bold",
label.size = .5, # label border thickness
size = 3.5, # label size
# force = .005, # repelling force: requires ggrepel
show.legend = FALSE) +``````

Choosing plot type is largely a judgement call, but you should always make sure to choose the type of graphic that would best suite the data you have. In this case, our goal is to reveal the dynamics of wages in Saskatchewan over time, hence our choice of geom_line. Note that the lines in our graphic are for visual aid only – to make it easier for an eye to follow the trend. They are not substantively meaningful like they would be, for example, in a regression plot. geom_point is also there primarily for visual purposes – to make the plot’s legend more visible. Note that unlike the lines, the points in this plot are substantively meaningful, i.e. they are exactly where our data is (but are covered by labels). If you don’t like the labels in the graphic, you can use points instead.

Finally, geom_label plots our substantive data. Note that I am using show.legend = FALSE argument – this is simply because I don’t like the look of geom_label legend symbols, and prefer a combined line+point symbol instead. If you prefer geom_label symbols in the plot’s legend, remove show.legend = FALSE argument from geom_label call, and add it to geom_line and geom_point.

#### Preventing Overlaps with ggrepel

You have noticed some commented lines in the ggplot call. You may also have noticed that some labels in our graphic overlap slightly. In this case the overlap is minute and can be ignored. But what if there are a lot of overlapping data points, enough to affect readability?

Fortunately, there is a package to solve this problem for the graphics that use text labels: ggrepel. It has *_repel versions of ggplot2::geom_label and ggplot2::geom_text functions, which repel the labels away from each other and away from the data points.

``````install.packages("ggrepel")
library("ggrepel")``````

ggrepel functions can take the same arguments as corresponding ggplot2 functions, and also take the force argument that defines repelling force between overlapping text labels. I recommend setting it to a small value, as the default 1 seems way too strong.

Here is what our graphic looks like now. Note that the nearby labels no longer overlap:

#### Axes and Scales

This is where axes and scales are defined:

``````coord_cartesian(ylim = c(650, 1000)) +
scale_x_continuous(breaks = 2007:2018) +
scale_y_continuous(name = "2007 dollars",
breaks = seq(650, 1000, by = 50)) +
scale_color_manual(values = c("First Nations" = "tan3",
"Non-Aboriginal" = "royalblue",
"Metis" = "forestgreen")) +``````

coord_cartesian is the function I’d like to draw your attention to, as it is the best way to zoom the plot, i.e. to get rid of unnecessary empty space. Since we don’t have any values less than 650 or more than 950 (approximately), starting our Y scale at 0 would result in a less readable plot, where most space would be empty, and the space where we actually have data would be crowded. If you are interested in why coord_cartesian is the best way to set axis limits, there is an in-depth explanation.

( ! ) It is a good practice to use coord_cartesian to change axis limits.

#### Plot Theme, Title, and Captions

Next, we edit our plot theme:

``````theme_bw() +
theme(plot.title = element_text(size = 12,
face = "bold",
hjust = .5,
margin = margin(b = 10)),
plot.caption = element_text(size = 11),
panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
panel.grid.major = element_line(colour = "grey85"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 11),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold",
margin = margin(r = 10)),
legend.title = element_blank(),
legend.position = "bottom",
legend.text = element_text(size = 11, face = "bold")) +``````

First I selected a simple black-and-white theme theme_bw, and then overrode some of the theme’s default settings in order to improve the plot’s readability and overall appearance. Which theme and settings to use is up to you, just make sure that whatever you do makes the plot easier to read and comprehend at a glance. Here you can find out more about editing plot theme.

Finally, we enter the plot title and plot captions. Captions are used to provide information about the sources of our data. Note the use of \n (new line symbol) to break strings into multiple lines:

``````labs(title = "Average Weekly Wages, Adjusted for Inflation,\nby Aboriginal Group, 25 Years and Older",
caption = "Wages data: Statistics Canada Data Table 14-10-0370\nInflation data: Statistics Canada Data Vector v41694489")``````

``````# save plot